Celeron N4100 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.1 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
506e3
Core
Gemini Lake
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
37.88k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
2.59k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
3.94k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
1k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2k (x0.71)
TOTAL
17.21k
9.52k (x0.55)
Multithread
N4100
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
10.4k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
16.64k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
4.51k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
6.33k (x1.9)
TOTAL
40.57k
37.88k (x0.93)
Performance/W
N4100
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
474 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4