Celeron N4100 vs Core 2 Duo E8500
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E8500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.3 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E8500 gets 31.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.3 times faster than the E8500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.167 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Cache L3
kB
kB
Date
December 2017
August 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
31.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
3.65k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
8.07k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
3.15k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
4.59k (x1.64)
TOTAL
17.21k
19.46k (x1.13)
Multithread
N4100
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
7.11k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
15.79k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
6.2k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
2.13k (x0.64)
TOTAL
40.57k
31.21k (x0.77)
Performance/W
N4100
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
109 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
243 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
95 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
480 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
E8500
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
1151 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
994 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
1450 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
6144 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4