Celeron N4100 vs Core 2 Duo E7200
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E7200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.6 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the E7200 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.6 times faster than the E7200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
10676
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.533 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.533 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
13.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
25.21k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
2.93k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
6.48k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
2.6k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
1.45k (x0.52)
TOTAL
17.21k
13.46k (x0.78)
Multithread
N4100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
5.85k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
12.91k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
5.22k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
1.23k (x0.37)
TOTAL
40.57k
25.21k (x0.62)
Performance/W
N4100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
199 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
80 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
388 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
E7200
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
574 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
5315 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4