| | | | | | |

Celeron N4100 vs Core i5-4210U


Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the i5-4210U gets 45.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-4210U is 1.1 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
40651
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
57.58k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
9.26k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
8.2k (x1.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
3.57k (x1.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
2.92k (x1.04)
TOTAL
17.21k
23.95k (x1.39)

Multithread

N4100

i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
17.53k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
17.56k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
7.65k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
2.49k (x0.75)
TOTAL
40.57k
45.22k (x1.11)

Performance/W
N4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
1169 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
1171 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
510 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
166 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
3015 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4100
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
3429 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
3038 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1322 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
1083 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
8872 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4