| | | | | | |

Celeron N4100 vs Core i5-3320M


Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-3320M is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the i5-3320M gets 54.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3320M is 1.3 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
29.22k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
58.81k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
10.89k (x2.31)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
9.77k (x1.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
3.98k (x1.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
3.77k (x1.34)
TOTAL
17.21k
28.4k (x1.65)

Multithread

N4100

i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
20.23k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
20.83k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
9.49k (x1.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
4.04k (x1.21)
TOTAL
40.57k
54.6k (x1.35)

Performance/W
N4100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
578 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
595 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
271 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
115 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
1560 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4100
i5-3320M
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
3300 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
2960 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
1205 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
1141 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
8607 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4