Celeron N4100 vs Core i5-1035G1
Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.5 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 3.5 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
706e5
Core
Gemini Lake
Ice Lake-U
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
171.65k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
12.89k (x2.73)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
18.55k (x2.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
9.93k (x3.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
9.54k (x3.39)
TOTAL
17.21k
50.91k (x2.96)
Multithread
N4100
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
50.06k (x3.99)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
66.1k (x3.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
20.24k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
5.51k (x1.66)
TOTAL
40.57k
141.91k (x3.5)
Performance/W
N4100
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
9461 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4100
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4