| | | | | | |

Celeron N4100 vs J1900


Description
The N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the J1900 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4100 gets a score of 40.6 k points while the J1900 gets 33.2 k points.

Summarizing, the N4100 is 1.2 times faster than the J1900. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
30679
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-D
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.4 GHz
2.42 GHz
Socket
BGA1090
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
6 W
10 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
December 2017
November 2013
Mean monothread perf.
17.21k points
9.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
40.57k points
33.25k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4100
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
4.72k
4.58k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
6.99k
2.32k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.69k
1.72k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.81k
1.14k (x0.4)
TOTAL
17.21k
9.75k (x0.57)

Multithread

N4100

J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
12.54k
17.16k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
17.99k
8.42k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
6.71k
6.22k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.33k
1.44k (x0.43)
TOTAL
40.57k
33.25k (x0.82)

Performance/W
N4100
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
2090 points/W
1716 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2999 points/W
842 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1118 points/W
622 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
555 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
6762 points/W
3325 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4100
J1900
Test#1 (Integers)
1966 points/GHz
1893 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2914 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1122 points/GHz
709 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1171 points/GHz
470 points/GHz
TOTAL
7172 points/GHz
4029 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4