Celeron N4020 vs Pentium Dual-Core T4500
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the T4500 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the T4500 gets 23 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the T4500 gets 23 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the T4500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Penryn-3M
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.3 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket P
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
12.07k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
23.03k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
2.11k (x1.68)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
5.4k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.27k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
1.22k (x0.76)
TOTAL
10.61k
10.99k (x1.04)
Multithread
N4020
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
4.2k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
10.75k (x1.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
4.53k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.34k (x1.04)
TOTAL
13.78k
20.83k (x1.51)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
2.63k (x0.5)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
5.88k (x0.74)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
2.36k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
1.19k (x0.67)
TOTAL
17.88k
12.07k (x0.67)
Multithread
N4020
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
5.27k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
11.69k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.73k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.35k (x0.75)
TOTAL
26.91k
23.03k (x0.86)
Performance/W
N4020
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
150 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
334 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
135 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
658 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
T4500
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
2558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
516 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
5246 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4