Celeron N4020 vs Xeon W3530
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the W3530 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 2.7 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the W3530 gets 72.8 k points.
Summarizing, the W3530 is 2.7 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.067 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
4 /4
TDP
6 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
18.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
72.77k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
7.51k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
4.93k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
3.02k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
2.74k (x1.55)
TOTAL
17.88k
18.2k (x1.02)
Multithread
N4020
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
31.33k (x3.91)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
23.11k (x1.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
15.78k (x3.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.55k (x1.43)
TOTAL
26.91k
72.77k (x2.7)
Performance/W
N4020
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
241 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
178 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
121 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
560 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
W3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
2450 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1608 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
892 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
5935 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4