| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs Xeon E5502


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.

Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.2 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
106a5
Core
Gemini Lake
Gainestown
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
22.28k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
4.76k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
3.15k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
1.94k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
1.45k (x0.82)
TOTAL
17.88k
11.3k (x0.63)

Multithread

N4020

E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
9.48k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
6.3k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.86k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.64k (x1.48)
TOTAL
26.91k
22.28k (x0.83)

Performance/W
N4020
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
278 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4