Celeron N4020 vs Core 2 Quad Q6600
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the Q6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the Q6600 gets 30.6 k points.
Summarizing, the Q6600 is 1.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
6fb
Core
Gemini Lake
Kentsfield
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
8192 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2019
July 2007
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
8.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
30.64k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
2.78k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
2.49k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.37k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
1.29k (x0.73)
TOTAL
17.67k
8.92k (x0.51)
Multithread
N4020
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
10.9k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
9.79k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
9.11k (x2.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
0.84k (x0.44)
TOTAL
25.26k
30.64k (x1.21)
Performance/W
N4020
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
115 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
103 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
96 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
9 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
323 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
Q6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
539 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
3718 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4