Celeron N4020 vs Core 2 Duo E8200
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E8200 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.1 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the E8200 gets 25.4 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.1 times faster than the E8200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
10676
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2008
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
15.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
25.39k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
3k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
6.62k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
2.55k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
3.6k (x2.04)
TOTAL
17.88k
15.77k (x0.88)
Multithread
N4020
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
5.83k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
12.64k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.97k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.95k (x1.09)
TOTAL
26.91k
25.39k (x0.94)
Performance/W
N4020
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
90 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
194 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
76 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
30 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
391 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
E8200
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
2481 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
957 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
1349 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
5912 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4