Celeron N4020 vs Core 2 Duo E6600
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E6600 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.7 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the E6600 gets 16.1 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.7 times faster than the E6600 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
6f6
Core
Gemini Lake
Conroe
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
November 2019
July 2006
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
9.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
16.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
2.38k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
2.39k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.39k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
2.79k (x1.73)
TOTAL
10.61k
9.95k (x0.94)
Multithread
N4020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
4.68k (x2.78)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
4.68k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
4.69k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
1.8k (x1.4)
TOTAL
13.78k
15.86k (x1.15)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
2.7k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
2.42k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
2.41k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
2.46k (x1.39)
TOTAL
17.88k
9.99k (x0.56)
Multithread
N4020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
5.19k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
4.55k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
4.6k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.78k (x1)
TOTAL
26.91k
16.12k (x0.6)
Performance/W
N4020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
80 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
70 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
71 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
27 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
248 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
E6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1125 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1009 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
1025 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
4164 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4