Celeron N4020 vs Core i5-520M
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-520M is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.3 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the i5-520M gets 33.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-520M is 1.3 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
20652
Core
Gemini Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.933 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
FC-PGA 988
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/4
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
15.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
33.14k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
6.67k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
4.59k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.49k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
2.18k (x1.24)
TOTAL
17.67k
15.93k (x0.9)
Multithread
N4020
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
13.75k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
10.03k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
6.67k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
2.68k (x1.4)
TOTAL
25.26k
33.14k (x1.31)
Performance/W
N4020
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
393 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
287 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
191 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
947 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
i5-520M
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
2275 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
1567 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
849 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
742 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
5433 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4