| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs Core i5-3317U


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-3317U is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the i5-3317U gets 45.2 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-3317U is 1.7 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1023
Cores/Threads
2/2
2 /2
TDP
6 W
17 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
17.88k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
41.31k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
2.5k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
7.18k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
3.19k (x1.24)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
3.41k (x2.12)
TOTAL
10.61k
16.27k (x1.53)

Multithread

N4020

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
4.93k (x2.93)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
15.72k (x2.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
7.53k (x2.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
4.21k (x3.26)
TOTAL
13.78k
32.39k (x2.35)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
8.38k (x1.6)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
7.76k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
3.33k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
3.41k (x1.93)
TOTAL
17.88k
22.88k (x1.28)

Multithread

N4020

i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
16.56k (x2.07)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
16.79k (x1.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
7.85k (x1.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
4.02k (x2.26)
TOTAL
26.91k
45.23k (x1.68)

Performance/W
N4020
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
974 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
462 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
237 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
2660 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
i5-3317U
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
3225 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
2984 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
1281 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
1311 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
8801 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4