| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs N3150


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N3150 is based on Airmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the N3150 gets 31.8 k points.

Summarizing, the N3150 is 1.2 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
406c3
Core
Gemini Lake
Braswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.08 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
2/2
4/4
TDP
6 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2019
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
9.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
31.8k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
1.07k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
1.74k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.5k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
1.46k (x0.91)
TOTAL
10.61k
5.78k (x0.54)

Multithread

N4020

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
3.99k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
6.31k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
5.05k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
2.65k (x2.05)
TOTAL
13.78k
18k (x1.31)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
3.91k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
2.29k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
1.57k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
1.44k (x0.82)
TOTAL
17.88k
9.21k (x0.52)

Multithread

N4020

N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
14.78k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
8.62k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.84k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.57k (x1.44)
TOTAL
26.91k
31.8k (x1.18)

Performance/W
N4020
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
2463 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
1437 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
973 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
428 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
5300 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
N3150
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1880 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
755 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
4429 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4