| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs Phenom II X6 1035T


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 1035T is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the 1035T gets 80.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 1035T is 3 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
100fa0
Core
Gemini Lake
Thuban
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
6/6
TDP
6 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
November 2019
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
16.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
80.19k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
1.98k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
4.57k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
2.57k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
3.51k (x2.19)
TOTAL
10.61k
12.64k (x1.19)

Multithread

N4020

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
11.86k (x7.05)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
27.4k (x3.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
15.39k (x4.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
3.46k (x2.68)
TOTAL
13.78k
58.11k (x4.22)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
5.17k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
5.33k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
2.76k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
3.51k (x1.99)
TOTAL
17.88k
16.77k (x0.94)

Multithread

N4020

1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
29.82k (x3.72)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
30.79k (x2.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
15.88k (x3.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.69k (x2.07)
TOTAL
26.91k
80.19k (x2.98)

Performance/W
N4020
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
314 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
324 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
167 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
39 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
844 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
1035T
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1668 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1718 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
890 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
1133 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
5409 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4