| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs E Series E-350


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E-350 is based on Bobcat.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the E-350 gets 10 k points.

Summarizing, the N4020 is 2.7 times faster than the E-350. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
500f10
Core
Gemini Lake
Zacate
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket FT1
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
18 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Date
November 2019
January 2011
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
6.26k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
10.05k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N4020
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.25k
0.83k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
5.19k
2.38k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.56k
1.41k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.61k
0.75k (x0.46)
TOTAL
10.61k
5.37k (x0.51)

Multithread

N4020

E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
1.45k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
7.29k
3.97k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
3.51k
2.18k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.29k
0.82k (x0.63)
TOTAL
13.78k
8.42k (x0.61)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
1.78k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
2.33k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
1.41k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
0.74k (x0.42)
TOTAL
17.88k
6.26k (x0.35)

Multithread

N4020

E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
2.84k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
3.89k (x0.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
2.42k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
0.9k (x0.5)
TOTAL
26.91k
10.05k (x0.37)

Performance/W
N4020
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
158 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
216 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
134 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
50 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
558 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
E-350
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1454 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
879 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
465 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
3914 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4