| | | | | | |

Celeron N4020 vs Athlon II X2 260


Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 260 is based on K10.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the 260 gets 27.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 260 is 1 times faster than the N4020. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a8
100f63
Core
Gemini Lake
Regor
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket AM3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2019
May 2010
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
17.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
27.54k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
260
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
6.04k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
6.2k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
3.11k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
1.7k (x0.96)
TOTAL
17.88k
17.05k (x0.95)

Multithread

N4020

260
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
10.02k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
10.18k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
5.1k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.25k (x1.26)
TOTAL
26.91k
27.54k (x1.02)

Performance/W
N4020
260
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
154 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
157 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
78 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
424 points/W

Performance/GHz
N4020
260
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1886 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
971 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
532 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
5328 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4