Celeron N4020 vs Athlon II M300
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the M300 is based on K10.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.5 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 26.9 k points while the M300 gets 17.7 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1.5 times faster than the M300. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
100f62
Core
Gemini Lake
Caspian
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket S1G3
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
2x128 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
November 2019
October 2009
Mean monothread perf.
17.88k points
9.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
26.91k points
17.73k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
5.25k
2.66k (x0.51)
Test#2 (FP)
7.92k
3.84k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.94k
1.97k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.77k
1.1k (x0.62)
TOTAL
17.88k
9.57k (x0.54)
Multithread
N4020
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
8.01k
5.04k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
12.56k
7.46k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.55k
3.75k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.48k (x0.83)
TOTAL
26.91k
17.73k (x0.66)
Performance/W
N4020
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1336 points/W
144 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2094 points/W
213 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
758 points/W
107 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
297 points/W
42 points/W
TOTAL
4484 points/W
506 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
M300
Test#1 (Integers)
1875 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2828 points/GHz
1921 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1050 points/GHz
986 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
631 points/GHz
550 points/GHz
TOTAL
6384 points/GHz
4784 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4