Celeron N4020 vs A6 9210
Description
The N4020 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 9210 is based on Excavator.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N4020 gets a score of 25.3 k points while the 9210 gets 25.2 k points.
Summarizing, the N4020 is 1 times faster than the 9210. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a8
670f00
Core
Gemini Lake
Stoney Ridge
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.8 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket FP4
Cores/Threads
2/2
2/2
TDP
6 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
2x32+2x24 kB
1x96+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
November 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
17.67k points
20.78k points
Mean multithread perf.
25.26k points
27.13k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N4020
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
5.14k
4.87k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
7.89k
10.38k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.87k
2.59k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.76k
2.38k (x1.35)
TOTAL
17.67k
20.22k (x1.14)
Multithread
N4020
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
7.46k
7.41k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
11.61k
11.87k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.27k
3.35k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.91k
2.6k (x1.36)
TOTAL
25.26k
25.23k (x1)
Performance/W
N4020
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1244 points/W
494 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1936 points/W
792 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
712 points/W
223 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
319 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
4211 points/W
1682 points/W
Performance/GHz
N4020
9210
Test#1 (Integers)
1837 points/GHz
1740 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2816 points/GHz
3707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1026 points/GHz
925 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
630 points/GHz
851 points/GHz
TOTAL
6309 points/GHz
7222 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4