| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X5675


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the X5675 is 2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
206c2
Core
Gemini Lake
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
6 /12
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2017
February 2011

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
8768 (79.10%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5820 (-19.78%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3472 (26.05%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2983 (-10.09%)
TOTAL
18223
21043 (15.48%)

Multithread

J4105

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
53232 (182.51%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
39355 (43.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
27048 (161.25%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
5284 (8.88%)
TOTAL
61495
124918 (103.14%)

Performance/W
J4105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8