| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon X3430


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the X3430 is based on Nehalem.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the X3430 gets 55.7 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.1 times faster than the X3430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106e5
Core
Gemini Lake
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
October 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1745 (3.73%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
3951 (-25.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2295 (-16.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
2656 (-22.88%)
TOTAL
13165
10647 (-19.13%)

Multithread

J4105

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
6806 (6.49%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
15370 (-23.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
8896 (-12.97%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
4421 (-10.53%)
TOTAL
41572
35493 (-14.62%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
6407 (30.86%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
4275 (-41.08%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2384 (-13.44%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
2672 (-19.45%)
TOTAL
18223
15738 (-13.64%)

Multithread

J4105

X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
25195 (33.71%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
16764 (-38.92%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
9326 (-9.92%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
4372 (-9.90%)
TOTAL
61495
55657 (-9.49%)

Performance/W
J4105
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
265 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
176 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
98 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
46 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
586 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
X3430
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2288 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1527 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
852 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
954 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5621 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8