| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Xeon Bronze 3206R


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the 3206R is based on Cascade Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the 3206R gets 103.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3206R is 2.5 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
50657
Core
Gemini Lake
Cascade Lake-SP
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 3647-0
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/8
TDP
10 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
11264 kB
Date
December 2017
February 2020
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
31.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
216.02k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
1.97k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
8.15k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.37k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
4.84k (x1.41)
TOTAL
13.16k
17.32k (x1.32)

Multithread

J4105

3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
15.73k (x2.46)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
64.78k (x3.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
18.06k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
5.21k (x1.05)
TOTAL
41.57k
103.77k (x2.5)

Performance/W
J4105
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
762 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
212 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
61 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
1221 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
3206R
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
4287 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
9115 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4