Celeron J4105 vs Pentium P6200
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the P6200 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.7 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the P6200 gets 22.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.7 times faster than the P6200 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
20655
Core
Gemini Lake
Arrandale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.133 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
Socket G1
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2010
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
12.74k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
22.91k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
5.29k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
3.55k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.1k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
1.8k (x0.54)
TOTAL
18.22k
12.74k (x0.7)
Multithread
J4105
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
10.06k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
6.74k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
3.96k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
2.16k (x0.45)
TOTAL
61.49k
22.91k (x0.37)
Performance/W
J4105
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
287 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
193 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
113 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
62 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
655 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
P6200
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1667 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
982 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
845 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4