| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium N3540


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N3540 gets 37.5 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.6 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
30678
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
kB
Date
December 2017
July 2014
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
10.72k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
37.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
1.37k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
2k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
1.95k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
1.21k (x0.35)
TOTAL
13.16k
6.53k (x0.5)

Multithread

J4105

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
5.24k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
7.69k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
7.31k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
1.52k (x0.31)
TOTAL
41.57k
21.76k (x0.52)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
4.97k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
2.58k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
1.98k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
1.2k (x0.36)
TOTAL
18.22k
10.72k (x0.59)

Multithread

J4105

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
18.92k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
9.67k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
7.37k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
1.54k (x0.32)
TOTAL
61.49k
37.5k (x0.61)

Performance/W
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
2703 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1382 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
1053 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
220 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
5357 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1864 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
741 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
448 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
4020 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4