| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium N3540


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N3540 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N3540 gets 37.6 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.6 times faster than the N3540. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
30678
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
December 2017
July 2014

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1373 (-18.38%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
2001 (-62.17%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
1959 (-28.73%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1215 (-64.72%)
TOTAL
13165
6548 (-50.26%)

Multithread

J4105

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
5233 (-18.12%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
7705 (-61.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
7386 (-27.75%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1522 (-69.19%)
TOTAL
41572
21846 (-47.45%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
4928 (0.65%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
2588 (-64.34%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2000 (-27.40%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1204 (-63.70%)
TOTAL
18223
10719 (-41.18%)

Multithread

J4105

N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
18888 (0.24%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
9744 (-64.50%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
7466 (-27.89%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1498 (-69.14%)
TOTAL
61495
37596 (-38.86%)

Performance/W
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
2698 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1392 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
1067 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
5371 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
N3540
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1848 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
970 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
750 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
452 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
4019 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8