| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium N3530


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N3530 is based on Silvermont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N3530 gets 34.6 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.8 times faster than the N3530. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
30678
Core
Gemini Lake
Bay Trail-M
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.167 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.58 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1170
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
7,5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
December 2017
February 2014

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
4861 (-0.70%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
2496 (-65.60%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1824 (-33.77%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1260 (-62.03%)
TOTAL
18223
10441 (-42.70%)

Multithread

J4105

N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
17222 (-8.60%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
8885 (-67.63%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
6887 (-33.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1574 (-67.56%)
TOTAL
61495
34569 (-43.79%)

Performance/W
J4105
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
2460 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
984 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
4938 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
N3530
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1884 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
967 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
707 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
488 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
4047 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8