| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium G2020


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the G2020 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the G2020 gets 42.4 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.5 times faster than the G2020 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306a9
Core
Gemini Lake
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.9 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
55 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2013

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2942 (74.88%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
8233 (55.64%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
3695 (34.42%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
2461 (-28.53%)
TOTAL
13165
17332 (31.65%)

Multithread

J4105

G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
5538 (-13.35%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
15468 (-22.73%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
7060 (-30.93%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2988 (-39.54%)
TOTAL
41572
31054 (-25.30%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
9902 (102.27%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
9010 (24.18%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3869 (40.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3089 (-6.87%)
TOTAL
18223
25871 (41.97%)

Multithread

J4105

G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
18830 (-0.07%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
14146 (-48.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
6606 (-36.20%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2810 (-42.10%)
TOTAL
61495
42392 (-31.06%)

Performance/W
J4105
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
257 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
120 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
51 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
771 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
G2020
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3415 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
3107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1334 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1065 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
8921 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8