| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core 2 Duo E7400


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E7400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E7400 gets 28 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 2.2 times faster than the E7400 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
1067a
Core
Gemini Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
October 2008

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2536 (50.75%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
6563 (24.06%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2730 (-0.69%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1833 (-46.78%)
TOTAL
13165
13662 (3.78%)

Multithread

J4105

E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
5076 (-20.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
13070 (-34.71%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
5517 (-46.03%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1625 (-67.12%)
TOTAL
41572
25288 (-39.17%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
3208 (-34.46%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
7151 (-1.44%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2867 (4.10%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1835 (-44.69%)
TOTAL
18223
15062 (-17.35%)

Multithread

J4105

E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
6422 (-65.92%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
14244 (-48.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
5745 (-44.51%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1607 (-66.88%)
TOTAL
61495
28019 (-54.44%)

Performance/W
J4105
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
99 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
219 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
88 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
25 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
431 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E7400
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2554 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1024 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
655 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5379 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8