| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-860


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i7-860 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i7-860 gets 75.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-860 is 1.2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
106e5
Core
Gemini Lake
Lynnfield
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1156
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
8192 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
2150 (27.79%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
4870 (-7.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
2822 (2.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3127 (-9.19%)
TOTAL
13165
12968 (-1.49%)

Multithread

J4105

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
8236 (28.86%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
21629 (8.05%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
14650 (43.32%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
5024 (1.68%)
TOTAL
41572
49538 (19.16%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
7874 (60.84%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
5250 (-27.65%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
2938 (6.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
3126 (-5.78%)
TOTAL
18223
19187 (5.29%)

Multithread

J4105

i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
31501 (67.18%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
23474 (-14.47%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
15474 (49.46%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
4977 (2.55%)
TOTAL
61495
75425 (22.65%)

Performance/W
J4105
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
332 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
247 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
163 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
52 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
794 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i7-860
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2271 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1514 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
847 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
902 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5534 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8