Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-8750H
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i7-8750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i7-8750H gets 52.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-8750H is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
906ea
Core
Gemini Lake
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
10 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
9216 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
53.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
231.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
3.01k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
11.68k (x2.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.78k (x1.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
5.64k (x1.64)
TOTAL
13.16k
24.12k (x1.83)
Multithread
J4105
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
7.4k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
29.99k (x1.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
9.66k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
5.12k (x1.04)
TOTAL
41.57k
52.18k (x1.26)
Performance/W
J4105
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
165 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
215 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
114 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
1160 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
i7-8750H
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
734 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
2850 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
922 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
5883 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4