| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i7-5820K


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-5820K is 2.8 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
306f2
Core
Gemini Lake
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
10 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
15360 kB
Date
December 2017
September 2014

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
3822 (127.13%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
9641 (82.25%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
4286 (55.95%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
3781 (9.80%)
TOTAL
13165
21530 (63.55%)

Multithread

J4105

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
18067 (182.68%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
64252 (220.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
27029 (164.42%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
8034 (62.60%)
TOTAL
41572
117381 (182.36%)

Performance/W
J4105
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
838 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
1062 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8