| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-7300U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-7300U gets 82.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-7300U is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
806e9
Core
Gemini Lake
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2017

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
3107 (84.67%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
12238 (131.33%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
4105 (49.34%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
4957 (43.95%)
TOTAL
13165
24406 (85.39%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
6976 (9.15%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
32048 (60.10%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
10816 (5.82%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
5515 (11.62%)
TOTAL
41572
55356 (33.16%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
9958 (103.41%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
15107 (108.22%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
3867 (40.38%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
4537 (36.75%)
TOTAL
18223
33469 (83.66%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
25264 (34.08%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
40604 (47.94%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
11243 (8.59%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
5832 (20.17%)
TOTAL
61495
82943 (34.88%)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1684 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
2707 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
750 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
389 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
5530 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2845 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
4316 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1105 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1296 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
9563 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8