| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-10500H


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-10500H gets 290.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-10500H is 4.7 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
a0652
Core
Gemini Lake
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/4
6/12
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
12288 kB
Date
December 2017
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
378.99k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
4.98k (x2.96)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
17.92k (x3.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.81k (x2.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
12.55k (x3.64)
TOTAL
13.16k
41.26k (x3.13)

Multithread

J4105

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
29.53k (x4.62)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
118.16k (x5.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
38.43k (x3.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
5.29k (x1.07)
TOTAL
41.57k
191.41k (x4.6)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
15.89k (x3.25)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
22.74k (x3.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
6.09k (x2.21)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
12.49k (x3.77)
TOTAL
18.22k
57.21k (x3.14)

Multithread

J4105

i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
96.8k (x5.14)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
149.1k (x5.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
39.68k (x3.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
5.28k (x1.09)
TOTAL
61.49k
290.85k (x4.73)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
2294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
610 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
4475 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3531 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1353 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2776 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
12713 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4