| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 141.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-1035G1 is 2.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
706e5
Core
Gemini Lake
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
6144 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2019

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
3876 (130.37%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
14979 (183.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
9699 (252.88%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
8599 (149.73%)
TOTAL
13165
37153 (182.22%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
14612 (128.61%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
54898 (174.24%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
27578 (169.80%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
5044 (2.09%)
TOTAL
41572
102132 (145.67%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
12888 (163.26%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
18551 (155.69%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
9934 (260.65%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
9539 (187.53%)
TOTAL
18223
50912 (179.38%)

Multithread

J4105

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
50059 (165.67%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
66100 (140.84%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
20239 (95.48%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
5514 (13.63%)
TOTAL
61495
141913 (130.77%)

Performance/W
J4105
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
3337 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
4407 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
1349 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
368 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
9461 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3580 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
5153 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
2759 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2650 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
14142 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8