Celeron J4105 vs Core i3-6100T
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 41.6 k points while the i3-6100T gets 50.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-6100T is 1.2 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
506e3
Core
Gemini Lake
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
3072 kB
Date
December 2017
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
105.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
3.14k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
12.26k (x2.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
3.94k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
2.21k (x0.64)
TOTAL
13.16k
21.55k (x1.64)
Multithread
J4105
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
6.52k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
30.61k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
10.59k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
2.77k (x0.56)
TOTAL
41.57k
50.49k (x1.21)
Performance/W
J4105
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
639 points/W
186 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2002 points/W
875 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1022 points/W
302 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
494 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
4157 points/W
1442 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
673 points/GHz
980 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2116 points/GHz
3832 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1099 points/GHz
1231 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1377 points/GHz
690 points/GHz
TOTAL
5266 points/GHz
6733 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4