| | | | | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the i3-10110U gets 80.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-10110U is 1.3 times faster than the J4105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
806ec
Core
Gemini Lake
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/4
TDP
10 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
0 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
4.26k (x2.53)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
15.48k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
4.94k (x1.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
4.31k (x1.25)
TOTAL
13.16k
28.98k (x2.2)

Multithread

J4105

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
7.41k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
29.18k (x1.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
10.26k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
3.27k (x0.66)
TOTAL
41.57k
50.13k (x1.21)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
14.3k (x2.92)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
20.09k (x2.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
5.23k (x1.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
4.24k (x1.28)
TOTAL
18.22k
43.87k (x2.41)

Multithread

J4105

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
25.51k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
41.33k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
10.81k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.21k (x0.66)
TOTAL
61.49k
80.85k (x1.31)

Performance/W
J4105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
1700 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
2755 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
5390 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
3487 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
4901 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1277 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1035 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
10699 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4