Celeron J4105 vs N4120
Description
Both models J4105 and N4120 are based on Goldmont Plus architecture.
Goldmont Plus is a low power architecture intended for Atom, Celeron y Pentium Silver SoCs. It uses the 14nm process and come with the Gen9 Intel’s iGPU.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Goldmont Plus is a low power architecture intended for Atom, Celeron y Pentium Silver SoCs. It uses the 14nm process and come with the Gen9 Intel’s iGPU.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.3 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
706a8
Core
Gemini Lake
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
December 2017
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
5.94k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
7.51k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
2.78k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
2.67k (x0.81)
TOTAL
18.22k
18.9k (x1.04)
Multithread
J4105
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
15.02k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
19.77k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
7.71k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
3.67k (x0.76)
TOTAL
61.49k
46.17k (x0.75)
Performance/W
J4105
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4