| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs N3450


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 1.6 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
506c9
Core
Gemini Lake
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/4
TDP
10 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
2x1024 kB
Date
December 2017
August 2016

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1542 (-8.36%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
2856 (-46.00%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
1875 (-31.78%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1784 (-48.20%)
TOTAL
13165
8057 (-38.80%)

Multithread

J4105

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
5908 (-7.56%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
8546 (-57.31%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
5483 (-46.36%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
2982 (-39.64%)
TOTAL
41572
22919 (-44.87%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
5953 (21.59%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
3454 (-52.39%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1922 (-30.22%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1781 (-46.30%)
TOTAL
18223
13110 (-28.06%)

Multithread

J4105

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
21382 (13.47%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
9838 (-64.15%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
5250 (-49.29%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
2862 (-41.03%)
TOTAL
61495
39332 (-36.04%)

Performance/W
J4105
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8