Celeron J4105 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160
Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 4.8 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the J4105 is 4.8 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
706a1
6f2
Core
Gemini Lake
Allendale
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
June 2007
Mean monothread perf.
18.22k points
7k points
Mean multithread perf.
61.49k points
12.87k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1.68k
1.81k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
5.29k
1.81k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
1.79k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.44k
1.16k (x0.34)
TOTAL
13.16k
6.58k (x0.5)
Multithread
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
6.39k
3.62k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.02k
3.61k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.22k
3.59k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.94k
1.19k (x0.24)
TOTAL
41.57k
12.01k (x0.29)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
4.9k
2.08k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
7.26k
1.88k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2.75k
1.89k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.32k
1.16k (x0.35)
TOTAL
18.22k
7k (x0.38)
Multithread
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
18.84k
4.16k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
27.45k
3.74k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10.35k
3.78k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
4.85k
1.19k (x0.25)
TOTAL
61.49k
12.87k (x0.21)
Performance/W
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
198 points/W
Performance/GHz
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4