| | | |

Celeron J4105 vs Pentium Dual-Core E2160


Description
The J4105 is based on Goldmont Plus architecture while the E2160 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the J4105 gets a score of 61.5 k points while the E2160 gets 12.9 k points.

Summarizing, the J4105 is 4.8 times faster than the E2160 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
706a1
6f2
Core
Gemini Lake
Allendale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.5 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA 1090
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
10 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4096 kB
1024 kB
Date
December 2017
Jun 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1683
1812 (7.67%)
Test#2 (FP)
5290
1811 (-65.76%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2749
1794 (-34.72%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3443
1161 (-66.29%)
TOTAL
13165
6578 (-50.03%)

Multithread

J4105

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
6391
3619 (-43.38%)
Test#2 (FP)
20018
3610 (-81.97%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10222
3593 (-64.85%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4941
1189 (-75.93%)
TOTAL
41572
12011 (-71.11%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
4896
2080 (-57.52%)
Test#2 (FP)
7255
1878 (-74.12%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2754
1889 (-31.41%)
Test#1 (Memory)
3317
1158 (-65.10%)
TOTAL
18223
7004 (-61.56%)

Multithread

J4105

E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
18843
4158 (-77.93%)
Test#2 (FP)
27446
3739 (-86.38%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
10353
3783 (-63.47%)
Test#1 (Memory)
4853
1189 (-75.49%)
TOTAL
61495
12869 (-79.07%)

Performance/W
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1884 points/W
64 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2745 points/W
58 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1035 points/W
58 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
485 points/W
18 points/W
TOTAL
6149 points/W
198 points/W

Performance/GHz
J4105
E2160
Test#1 (Integers)
1958 points/GHz
1155 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
2902 points/GHz
1043 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1102 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
643 points/GHz
TOTAL
7289 points/GHz
3891 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8