| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Pentium T3400


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the T3400 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the T3400 gets 14.9 k points.

Summarizing, the T3400 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6fd
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Merom-2M
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
2.167 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
1024 kB
Date
September 2006
October 2008

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1862 (19.14%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
1895 (-37.45%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1417 (3.66%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
835 (11.25%)
TOTAL
6710
6009 (-10.45%)

Multithread

347

T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
0
4039 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
4165 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3549 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1204 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
12958 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2491 (16.34%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
2247 (-34.46%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
2171 (35.45%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
1141 (52.29%)
TOTAL
7921
8049 (1.62%)

Multithread

347

T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
0
4979 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
4432 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
4272 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1225 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
14908 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
142 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
127 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
35 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
426 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
T3400
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
1002 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
526 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
3714 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8