| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Core 2 Duo T6600


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the T6600 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the T6600 gets 20.6 k points.

Summarizing, the T6600 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
1067a
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Penryn-3M
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
Socket P
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
2048 kB
Date
September 2006
January 2009

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
2009 (28.58%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
5168 (70.57%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
2172 (58.95%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
753 (0.25%)
TOTAL
6710
10102 (50.56%)

Multithread

347

T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
0
3880 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
9837 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
4167 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
692 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
18576 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2551 (19.16%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
5587 (62.95%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
2262 (41.13%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
751 (0.29%)
TOTAL
7921
11151 (40.77%)

Multithread

347

T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
0
4900 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
10706 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
4335 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
688 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
20628 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
140 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
306 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
124 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
20 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
589 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
T6600
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
2539 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
1028 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
341 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
5068 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8