| | | |

Celeron D 347 vs Core 2 Duo E6320


Description
The 347 is based on NetBurst architecture while the E6320 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 347 gets a score of 0 k points while the E6320 gets 13.2 k points.

Summarizing, the E6320 is INF times faster than the 347. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
f65
6f6
Core
Cedar Mill-512
Conroe
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.06 GHz
1.86 GHz
Socket
LGA 775
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
1/1
2/2
TDP
86 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
16+16 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
512 kB
4096 kB
Date
September 2006
April 2007

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
347
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
1563
1867 (19.45%)
Test#2 (FP)
3030
1867 (-38.37%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1366
1819 (33.12%)
Test#1 (Memory)
751
1868 (148.81%)
TOTAL
6710
7421 (10.60%)

Multithread

347

E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
0
3694 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3710 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3604 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1140 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
12147 (inf%)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
347
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
2141
2161 (0.92%)
Test#2 (FP)
3428
1937 (-43.51%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1602
1945 (21.35%)
Test#1 (Memory)
749
2200 (193.78%)
TOTAL
7921
8242 (4.06%)

Multithread

347

E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
0
4277 (inf%)
Test#2 (FP)
0
3821 (inf%)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0
3843 (inf%)
Test#1 (Memory)
0
1253 (inf%)
TOTAL
0
13194 (inf%)

Performance/W
347
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
0 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
0 points/W
59 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
0 points/W
59 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
0 points/W
19 points/W
TOTAL
0 points/W
203 points/W

Performance/GHz
347
E6320
Test#1 (Integers)
700 points/GHz
1162 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1120 points/GHz
1041 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
524 points/GHz
1045 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
245 points/GHz
1183 points/GHz
TOTAL
2589 points/GHz
4431 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.7.8