| | | | | | |

Celeron N3450 vs Pentium E5500


Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E5500 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 22.9 k points while the E5500 gets 20.7 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.1 times faster than the E5500 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
1067a
Core
Apollo Lake
Wolfdale
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 775
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
April 2010
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
12.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
20.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
2.56k (x1.66)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
6.54k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
2.76k (x1.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
0.91k (x0.51)
TOTAL
8.06k
12.77k (x1.58)

Multithread

N3450

E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
4.32k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
10.8k (x1.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
4.7k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
0.87k (x0.29)
TOTAL
22.92k
20.69k (x0.9)

Performance/W
N3450
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
985 points/W
66 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1424 points/W
166 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
914 points/W
72 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
497 points/W
13 points/W
TOTAL
3820 points/W
318 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3450
E5500
Test#1 (Integers)
701 points/GHz
914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1298 points/GHz
2335 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
852 points/GHz
985 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
811 points/GHz
325 points/GHz
TOTAL
3662 points/GHz
4560 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4