Celeron N3450 vs Xeon E5502
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E5502 is based on Nehalem.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.8 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the E5502 gets 22.3 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 1.8 times faster than the E5502 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
106a5
Core
Apollo Lake
Gainestown
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.867 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.867 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/4
2 /2
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
kB
4096 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2009
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
11.3k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
22.28k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
4.76k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
3.15k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
1.94k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.45k (x0.82)
TOTAL
13.11k
11.3k (x0.86)
Multithread
N3450
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
9.48k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
6.3k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
3.86k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
2.64k (x0.92)
TOTAL
39.33k
22.28k (x0.57)
Performance/W
N3450
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
118 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
79 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
48 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
33 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
278 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
E5502
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
2549 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
1685 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1038 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
779 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
6051 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4