| | | | | | |

Celeron N3450 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4


Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 182.4 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 4.6 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
406f1
Core
Apollo Lake
Broadwell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/4
8/16
TDP
6 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
20480 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
237.83k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
2.6k (x1.69)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
7.55k (x2.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
2.61k (x1.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.03k (x1.14)
TOTAL
8.06k
14.79k (x1.84)

Multithread

N3450

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
17.41k (x2.95)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
75.46k (x8.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
26.25k (x4.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.65k (x1.56)
TOTAL
22.92k
123.78k (x5.4)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
8.22k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
12.06k (x3.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
4.01k (x2.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2.89k (x1.62)
TOTAL
13.11k
27.18k (x2.07)

Multithread

N3450

E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
61.34k (x2.87)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
90.21k (x9.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
26.2k (x4.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
4.62k (x1.62)
TOTAL
39.33k
182.37k (x4.64)

Performance/W
N3450
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
722 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
1061 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
308 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
54 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
2146 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3450
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
2739 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
4021 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1335 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
963 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
9059 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4