| | | | | | |

Celeron N3450 vs Xeon E3-1230 v5


Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 37.9 k points.

Summarizing, the N3450 is 1 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
506c9
506e3
Core
Apollo Lake
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/4
4/8
TDP
6 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
8192 kB
Date
August 2016
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
37.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
0.7k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
2.8k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
0.85k (x0.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.88k (x1.06)
TOTAL
8.06k
6.23k (x0.77)

Multithread

N3450

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
2.74k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
12.87k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
3.89k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
6.03k (x2.02)
TOTAL
22.92k
25.52k (x1.11)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
2.59k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
3.94k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
1k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
2k (x1.12)
TOTAL
13.11k
9.52k (x0.73)

Multithread

N3450

E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
10.4k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
16.64k (x1.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
4.51k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
6.33k (x2.21)
TOTAL
39.33k
37.88k (x0.96)

Performance/W
N3450
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
130 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
56 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
79 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
474 points/W

Performance/GHz
N3450
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
681 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
1037 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
263 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
525 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
2506 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4