Celeron N3450 vs Pentium G3260
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the G3260 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.5 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the G3260 gets 58.9 k points.
Summarizing, the G3260 is 1.5 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
306c3
Core
Apollo Lake
Haswell
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
LGA1150
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
53 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
kB
3072 kB
Date
August 2016
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
30.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
58.89k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
11.73k (x1.97)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
10.45k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
4.55k (x2.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
3.83k (x2.15)
TOTAL
13.11k
30.56k (x2.33)
Multithread
N3450
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
22.99k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
20.53k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
8.82k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
6.55k (x2.29)
TOTAL
39.33k
58.89k (x1.5)
Performance/W
N3450
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
434 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
387 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
1111 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
G3260
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
3555 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
3165 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1380 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
1161 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
9261 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4