Celeron N3450 vs Core 2 Duo T7250
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the T7250 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 2.8 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the T7250 gets 13.8 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 2.8 times faster than the T7250 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
6fd
Core
Apollo Lake
Merom
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
2 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
September 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
7.57k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
13.82k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
N3450
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
1.54k
1.96k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
2.86k
2k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.88k
1.96k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.22k (x0.69)
TOTAL
8.06k
7.14k (x0.89)
Multithread
N3450
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
5.91k
3.87k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
8.55k
3.95k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.48k
3.8k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
1.34k (x0.45)
TOTAL
22.92k
12.96k (x0.57)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
2.27k (x0.38)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
2.07k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
2.01k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.22k (x0.69)
TOTAL
13.11k
7.57k (x0.58)
Multithread
N3450
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
4.51k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
4.09k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
3.9k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
1.32k (x0.46)
TOTAL
39.33k
13.82k (x0.35)
Performance/W
N3450
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
117 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
111 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
38 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
395 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
T7250
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
1135 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
1036 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
611 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
3787 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4