Celeron N3450 vs Core 2 Duo T7100
Description
The N3450 is based on Goldmont architecture while the T7100 is based on Core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 3 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the N3450 gets a score of 39.3 k points while the T7100 gets 12.9 k points.
Summarizing, the N3450 is 3 times faster than the T7100 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
506c9
6fd
Core
Apollo Lake
Merom
Base frecuency
1.1 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
2.2 GHz
1.8 GHz
Socket
BGA1296
Socket P
Cores/Threads
4/4
2/2
TDP
6 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x32+4x24 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
2x1024 kB
2048 kB
Cache L3
kB
0 kB
Date
August 2016
May 2007
Mean monothread perf.
13.11k points
7.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
39.33k points
12.9k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
N3450
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
5.95k
2.08k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
3.45k
1.86k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1.92k
1.86k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
1.78k
1.25k (x0.7)
TOTAL
13.11k
7.05k (x0.54)
Multithread
N3450
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
21.38k
4.16k (x0.19)
Test#2 (FP)
9.84k
3.73k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.25k
3.73k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.86k
1.28k (x0.45)
TOTAL
39.33k
12.9k (x0.33)
Performance/W
N3450
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3564 points/W
119 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1640 points/W
107 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
875 points/W
106 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
477 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
6555 points/W
369 points/W
Performance/GHz
N3450
T7100
Test#1 (Integers)
2706 points/GHz
1157 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
1570 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
874 points/GHz
1034 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
810 points/GHz
692 points/GHz
TOTAL
5959 points/GHz
3916 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4